relying on Crane to find that the trial court erred in excluding expert testimony about "how and why someone could make a falsely incriminating statement"
Summary of this case from State v. StringhamNo. 15279-1-III.
June 17, 1997. UNREPORTED OPINION
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Chelan County, No. 95-1-00150-6, Ted W. Small, J., entered November 3, 1995.
Reversed by unpublished opinion per Thompson, J., concurred in by Sweeney, C.J., and Schultheis, J.
relying on Crane to find that the trial court erred in excluding expert testimony about "how and why someone could make a falsely incriminating statement"
Summary of this case from State v. StringhamFull title:THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent , v. LINDA J. MILLER, Appellant
Court:The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three
Date published: Jun 17, 1997
{¶ 44} Notably, we are not alone in our view that Crane extends to cases other than those in which the…
People v. RosarioThe court notes that the cases relied upon by the defense, in which expert testimony regarding false…