From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Miller

Oregon Court of Appeals
Mar 16, 1981
624 P.2d 1100 (Or. Ct. App. 1981)

Opinion

No. M-80-7-14, CA 18719

Argued and submitted February 23, 1981

Reversed March 16, 1981

Appeal from Circuit Court, Clackamas County.

Patrick Gilroy, Judge.

John Mayfield, Oregon Legal Services Corporation, Oregon City, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

James C. Rhodes, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, John R. McCulloch, Jr., Solicitor General, and William F. Gary, Deputy Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Warden and Warren, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Reversed.



In this mental commitment proceeding, the trial court admitted, over defendant's objections, the testimony of defendant's treating physician and the investigation report prepared by that physician. The information obtained by defendant's treating physician in attending defendant is privileged. ORS 44.040(d). The privilege applies to commitment proceedings. State v. O'Neill, 274 Or. 59, 545 P.2d 97 (1976).

Accordingly, it was error to have admitted the testimony and report, and, as the state concedes, without that evidence, "there isn't much left." We agree.

Reversed.



Summaries of

State v. Miller

Oregon Court of Appeals
Mar 16, 1981
624 P.2d 1100 (Or. Ct. App. 1981)
Case details for

State v. Miller

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Scott Miller alleged to be a mentally ill person. STATE…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Mar 16, 1981

Citations

624 P.2d 1100 (Or. Ct. App. 1981)
624 P.2d 1100