From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Mike

Supreme Court of Florida
Jun 15, 2000
760 So. 2d 145 (Fla. 2000)

Opinion

No. SC93163.

Opinion filed June 15, 2000.

Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal — Certified Great Public Importance

First District — Case No. 1D97-1417.

(Suwannee County)

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, James W. Rogers, Bureau Chief, Criminal Appeals, and L. Michael Billmeier, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, for Petitioner.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Carol Ann Turner, Assistant Public Defender, Second Judicial Circuit, Tallahassee, Florida, for Respondent.


We have for review State v. Mike, 708 So.2d 1042 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998), wherein the First District certified the following question to be one of great public importance:

WHETHER THE WRONGFUL IMPOSITION OF A PUBLIC DEFENDER'S LIEN CONSTITUTES FUNDAMENTAL ERROR WHICH MAY BE CHALLENGED ON DIRECT APPEAL WITHOUT HAVING BEEN PRESENTED TO THE TRIAL COURT, IN LIGHT OF SECTION 924.051(3), FLORIDA STATUTES (SUPP. 1996), AND AMENDED RULE 3.800(B), FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE.

For the reasons expressed in our opinion in Maddox v. State, 25 Fla. L. Weekly S367 (Fla. May 11, 2000), we answer the certified question in the negative. We quash the decision below and find that the unpreserved sentencing errors asserted in this case do not constitute fundamental error.

It is so ordered.

HARDING, C.J., and SHAW, WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Mike

Supreme Court of Florida
Jun 15, 2000
760 So. 2d 145 (Fla. 2000)
Case details for

State v. Mike

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, v. EZEKIAS MIKE, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Jun 15, 2000

Citations

760 So. 2d 145 (Fla. 2000)

Citing Cases

Tennant v. State

See generally, § 938.27(1), Fla. Stat. (2001). The invalidity of the imposition of such cost judgments and…