From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Mickle

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Nov 1, 1927
140 S.E. 150 (N.C. 1927)

Opinion

(Filed 23 November, 1927.)

APPEALS by defendants from Townsend, Special Judge, at May Special Term, 1927, of FORSYTH. No error.

Attorney-General Brummitt and Assistant Attorney-General Nash for the State.

M.L. Mott, Jr., for defendants.


Criminal actions against defendants, in which each was charged with the wilful and unlawful operation of an automobile on a public highway in this State were, by consent, consolidated for trial.

From judgment on the verdict in each action defendants appealed to the Supreme Court.


Upon their appeal to this Court both defendants rely upon assignments of error based on exceptions to the refusal of the court to allow their motions for judgment as of nonsuit. C. S., 4643. These assignments of error are not sustained. The evidence was properly submitted to the jury and tended to show that each of the defendants operated an automobile on a public highway in this State, wilfully and recklessly, in violation of C. S., 2618. There is no error in the judgment that each defendant be confined in the county jail of Forsyth County for thirty days, with capias to issue upon motion of the Solicitor for the State, etc. C. S., 2599.

No error.


Summaries of

State v. Mickle

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Nov 1, 1927
140 S.E. 150 (N.C. 1927)
Case details for

State v. Mickle

Case Details

Full title:STATE v. W. C. MICKLE AND CARL HILL

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Nov 1, 1927

Citations

140 S.E. 150 (N.C. 1927)
194 N.C. 808

Citing Cases

State v. Hill

Restatement of the Law, Torts, section 500; State v. Bolsinger, 221 Minn. 154, 21 N.W.2d 480, 484, 491, and…