Opinion
No. 05-15-00965-CV
05-11-2016
STATE OF TEXAS AND CARLOS CASCOS, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS TEXAS SECRETARY OF STATE, Appellants v. LAWRENCE EDWARD MEYERS AND MYRTIS EVANS, Appellees
On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. DC-14-09939
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Bridges, Francis, and Myers
Opinion by Justice Bridges
While appellants' interlocutory appeal from their plea to the jurisdiction was pending in this Court, appellees filed a nonsuit. We conclude the nonsuit deprived this Court of jurisdiction. We dismiss this interlocutory appeal for want of jurisdiction.
Lawrence Edward Meyers and Myrtis Evans filed suit against the State of Texas, Carlos Cascos in his official capacity as Texas Secretary of State, and Toni Pippins-Poole in her official capacity as Dallas County Elections Administrator. The suit challenged the constitutionality of the election code provisions requiring an acceptable form of photographic identification before voting (the Voter ID law). See TEX. ELEC. CODE ANN. §§ 63.001-63.011 (West Supp. 2015). The State, Cascos, and Pippins-Poole filed a plea to the jurisdiction, which the trial court denied, and then brought an interlocutory appeal.
The record shows Meyers is identified as Judge Meyers of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. --------
Following oral argument in this Court, Meyers and Evans filed a nonsuit in the trial court. The State and Cascos filed a notice advising this Court of the nonsuit. The nonsuit deprived this Court of jurisdiction. Univ. of Tex. v. Estate of Blackmon, 195 S.W.3d 98, 100-01 (Tex. 2006) (nonsuit extinguishes case or controversy from "the moment the motion is filed" or oral motion made in open court).
Accordingly, we dismiss this interlocutory appeal for want of jurisdiction.
/David L. Bridges/
DAVID L. BRIDGES
JUSTICE 150965F.P05
JUDGMENT
On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. DC-14-09939.
Opinion delivered by Justice Bridges. Justices Francis and Myers participating.
In accordance with this Court's opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED for want of jurisdiction.
It is ORDERED that each party bear its own costs of this appeal. Judgment entered May 11, 2016.