From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Merrill

Oregon Supreme Court
Mar 24, 1994
869 P.2d 867 (Or. 1994)

Opinion

DC DA461348-9202; CA A76575; SC S40553

Argued March 9, 1993 Submitted March 9, 1993

review dismissed as improvidently allowed March 24, 1994

On review from the Court of Appeals.

Appeal from Multnomah County District Court, Roosevelt Robinson, Judge. 121 Or. App. 679, 855 P.2d 666 (1993).

Wayne Mackeson, Portland, argued the cause and filed the petition for petitioner on review.

Robert B. Rocklin, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent on review. With him on the response were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Carson, Chief Justice, and Gillette, Fadeley, Unis, Graber, and Durham, Justices.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Review dismissed as improvidently allowed.


Summaries of

State v. Merrill

Oregon Supreme Court
Mar 24, 1994
869 P.2d 867 (Or. 1994)
Case details for

State v. Merrill

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent on Review, v. MICHAEL FLOYD MERRILL…

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Mar 24, 1994

Citations

869 P.2d 867 (Or. 1994)
869 P.2d 867