From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Mercedes

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jun 26, 2000
754 A.2d 1208 (N.J. 2000)

Summary

remanding matter for re-sentencing of defendant under more favorable Brimage Guidelines where offense and plea of guilty preceded Brimage, and sentencing occurred post-Brimage

Summary of this case from State v. Fowlkes

Opinion

June 26, 2000


ON PETITION FOR CERTIFICATION

The Court having determined that because State v. Brimage, 153 N.J. 1, 706 A.2d 1096 (1998), was decided prior to defendant's sentencing, the Guidelines adopted pursuant to that decision should apply:

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is granted, and the matter is summarily remanded to the trial court for resentencing consistent with the Brimage Guidelines. If the court determines not to sentence in accordance with the Guidelines, the record on remand shall include a statement of reasons supporting that determination.

Jurisdiction is not retained.

SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY


Summaries of

State v. Mercedes

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jun 26, 2000
754 A.2d 1208 (N.J. 2000)

remanding matter for re-sentencing of defendant under more favorable Brimage Guidelines where offense and plea of guilty preceded Brimage, and sentencing occurred post-Brimage

Summary of this case from State v. Fowlkes
Case details for

State v. Mercedes

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. SEVERIANO MERCEDES…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Jun 26, 2000

Citations

754 A.2d 1208 (N.J. 2000)
754 A.2d 1208

Citing Cases

State v. Fowlkes

Defendant, therefore, could have received a plea offer comprised of a minimum of twenty months of parole…