Opinion
No. ED 106971
08-20-2019
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Jamie Donnell MENDEZ, Appellant.
ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT, Ellen H. Flottman, Public Defender’s Office, 1000 West Nifong, Building 7, Suite 100, Columbia, MO 65203. ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT, Eric S. Schmitt, Attorney General, Justin A. Moody, Asst. Attorney General, P. O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0899.
ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT, Ellen H. Flottman, Public Defender’s Office, 1000 West Nifong, Building 7, Suite 100, Columbia, MO 65203.
ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT, Eric S. Schmitt, Attorney General, Justin A. Moody, Asst. Attorney General, P. O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0899.
Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J. and Robert G. Dowd, Jr. and Roy L. Richter, JJ.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Jamie Mendez appeals from the judgment entered on his convictions after a jury trial for possession of a controlled substance and possession of paraphernalia, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence on both counts. We affirm.
An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).