From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Meier

Oregon Court of Appeals
Sep 9, 1986
719 P.2d 516 (Or. Ct. App. 1986)

Opinion

44737; CA A37305

Argued and submitted March 10, 1986.

Affirmed May 29, 1986. Reconsideration denied July 25, 1986. Petition for review allowed September 9, 1986 ( 301 Or. 765). See later issue Oregon Reports.

Appeal from District Court, Yamhill County, Wayne R. Harris, Judge.

Jonathan H. Fussner, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and James E. Mountain, Jr., Solicitor General, Salem.

Frank E. Stoller, Newberg, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.

Before Warden, Presiding Judge, and Van Hoomissen and Young, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Affirmed. State v. Ray, 79 Or. App. 529, 719 P.2d 922 (1986).

Van Hoomissen, J., dissenting.


I respectfully dissent for the reasons stated in my dissenting opinions in State v. Earing, 79 Or. App. 543, 719 P.2d 517 (1986), and State v. Henry, 78 Or. App. 392, 717 P.2d 189 (1986).


Summaries of

State v. Meier

Oregon Court of Appeals
Sep 9, 1986
719 P.2d 516 (Or. Ct. App. 1986)
Case details for

State v. Meier

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Appellant, v. TAMMY ANN MEIER, Respondent

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Sep 9, 1986

Citations

719 P.2d 516 (Or. Ct. App. 1986)
719 P.2d 516