Opinion
No. ED 96903.
2012-02-7
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Decalos MEEKS, Defendant/Appellant.
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Donald L. McCullin, Judge.Shaun J. Mackelprang, Robert J. Bartholomew, Jr., Jefferson City, MO, for Plaintiff/Respondent. Roxanna A. Mason, St. Louis, MO, for Defendant/Appellant.
Supreme Court Denied March 19, 2012.
Application for Transfer Denied
May 1, 2012.
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Donald L. McCullin, Judge.Shaun J. Mackelprang, Robert J. Bartholomew, Jr., Jefferson City, MO, for Plaintiff/Respondent. Roxanna A. Mason, St. Louis, MO, for Defendant/Appellant.
Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Decalos Meeks appeals from the trial court's judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of first-degree tampering of a motor vehicle and resisting or interfering with arrest. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting certain testimony of the complaining witness. State v. Chaney, 967 S.W.2d 47, 55 (Mo. banc 1998). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).