Accordingly, the evidence was sufficient to sustain Defendant's conviction of especially aggravated robbery. See State v. McPeak, No. W2001-00764-CCA-R3-CD, 2002 WL 1482792 (Tenn.Crim.App. at Jackson, Feb. 14, 2002) (Victim's testimony concerning the injuries he received during the robbery, including the number of blows to his head and a resultant permanent hearing impairment sufficient to support a finding of serious bodily injury). Finally, Defendant argues that the evidence was not sufficient to support a conviction because Mr. Scott's identification of Defendant as the perpetrator was unreliable.

In other words, where a witness denies involvement in the crime, the question of whether he or she is an accomplice is one of fact to be submitted to the jury with proper instructions from the court on how to consider such testimony. Anderson, 985 S.W.2d at 16 (citations omitted); State v. Jerry McPeak, IV, No. W2001-00764-CCA-R3-CD, 2002 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 129, at *14 n. 1 (Jackson, February 14, 2002).