From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. McKnight

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Jun 6, 2012
Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-341 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 6, 2012)

Opinion

Unpublished Opinion No.  2012-UP-341 

06-06-2012

The State, Respondent, v. Tommy McKnight, Appellant.

Chief Appellate Defender Robert M. Dudek, of Columbia, and Tommy McKnight, pro se, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka, and Solicitor Daniel E. Johnson, all of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Appeal From Kershaw County

J. Ernest Kinard Jr., Circuit Court Judge


APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Appellate Defender Robert M. Dudek, of Columbia, and Tommy McKnight, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka, and Solicitor Daniel E. Johnson, all of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM : Tommy McKnight appeals his conviction of murder, arguing the circuit court erred in denying his motion for a directed verdict. Additionally, McKnight asserts several pro se arguments. After a thorough review of the record and all briefs pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

WILLIAMS, THOMAS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. McKnight

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Jun 6, 2012
Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-341 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 6, 2012)
Case details for

State v. McKnight

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Tommy McKnight, Appellant.

Court:THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Jun 6, 2012

Citations

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-341 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 6, 2012)