From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. McKenna

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough
Jun 1, 1900
48 A. 1117 (N.H. 1900)

Opinion

Decided June, 1900.

Andrews Andrews, for the plaintiff.

Drury Hurd, for the defendant.


COMPLAINT, for bastardy. At a former term of court the defendant was found chargeable and ordered to pay a certain sum. A capias execution for the sum was issued, upon which the defendant was arrested; and, having given a bond for the purpose, he subsequently took the poor debtor's oath, the plaintiff objecting. At the May term, which was since the oath was taken, the action was brought forward, and the plaintiff's motion that the defendant be committed until he paid the sum ordered was denied pro forma, subject to exception.

PEASLEE, J., having been of counsel, did not sit; and the other members of the court being equally divided on the question, the motion failed of being granted.


Summaries of

State v. McKenna

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough
Jun 1, 1900
48 A. 1117 (N.H. 1900)
Case details for

State v. McKenna

Case Details

Full title:STATE (REYNOLDS, Compl't) v. McKENNA

Court:Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough

Date published: Jun 1, 1900

Citations

48 A. 1117 (N.H. 1900)
48 A. 1117

Citing Cases

Phair v. Melosh

That statute does not apply, in terms, to courts of equity but those courts act in analogy to the statute and…

Melosh v. Melosh

The statute of limitations does not apply, in terms, to courts of equity but those courts act in analogy to…