From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. McKay

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO .
Apr 7, 2015
460 S.W.3d 480 (E.D. Mo. 2015)

Opinion

No. ED 101042

04-07-2015

State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Daniel K. McKay, Appellant.

Margaret M. Johnston, Woodrail Centre, 1000 West Nifong, Building 7, Suite 100, Columbia, Missouri 65203, for appellant. Gregory L. Barnes, Assistant Attorney General, PO Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102, for respondent.


Margaret M. Johnston, Woodrail Centre, 1000 West Nifong, Building 7, Suite 100, Columbia, Missouri 65203, for appellant.Gregory L. Barnes, Assistant Attorney General, PO Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102, for respondent.

Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Daniel McKay (Defendant) appeals the trial court's order and judgment entered following remand from this Court for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether the State could rebut the presumption of prejudice caused by the delay in bringing Defendant to trial and whether Defendant's right to a speedy trial was violated. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and have determined that an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. Rule 30.25(b).


Summaries of

State v. McKay

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO .
Apr 7, 2015
460 S.W.3d 480 (E.D. Mo. 2015)
Case details for

State v. McKay

Case Details

Full title:State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Daniel K. McKay, Appellant.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO .

Date published: Apr 7, 2015

Citations

460 S.W.3d 480 (E.D. Mo. 2015)