From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. McDowell

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Oct 9, 2013
2013-UP-383 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 9, 2013)

Opinion

2013-UP-383

10-09-2013

The State, Respondent, v. Herbert McDowell, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2011-182926

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia; and Hebert McDowell, pro se, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, both of Columbia; and Solicitor Edgar L. Clements, III, of Florence, for Respondent.


UNPUBLISHED OPINION

Submitted September 1, 2013

Appeal From Florence County Thomas A. Russo, Circuit Court Judge

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia; and Hebert McDowell, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, both of Columbia; and Solicitor Edgar L. Clements, III, of Florence, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:

Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

SHORT, WILLIAMS, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. McDowell

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Oct 9, 2013
2013-UP-383 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 9, 2013)
Case details for

State v. McDowell

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Herbert McDowell, Appellant. Appellate Case No…

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Oct 9, 2013

Citations

2013-UP-383 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 9, 2013)