From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. McDowell

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Nov 12, 2020
No. S-1-SC-37199 (N.M. Nov. 12, 2020)

Opinion

No. S-1-SC-37199

11-12-2020

STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JOHN D. MCDOWELL, Defendant-Petitioner.

Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General Santa Fe, NM John J. Woykovsky, Assistant Attorney General Albuquerque, NM for Respondent Bennett J. Baur, Chief Public Defender Allison H. Jaramillo, Assistant Appellate Defender Santa Fe, NM for Petitioner


This decision of the Supreme Court of New Mexico was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished decisions. Electronic decisions may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Supreme Court.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ON CERTIORARI
Matthew E. Chandler, District Judge

Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General
Santa Fe, NM
John J. Woykovsky, Assistant Attorney General
Albuquerque, NM

for Respondent

Bennett J. Baur, Chief Public Defender
Allison H. Jaramillo, Assistant Appellate Defender
Santa Fe, NM

for Petitioner

DISPOSITIONAL ORDER OF REVERSAL

{1} WHEREAS, this matter came on for consideration by the Court upon petition for writ of certiorari filed pursuant to Rule 12-502 NMRA, and the Court having considered said petition and being sufficiently advised, issued its writ of certiorari on September 28, 2018;

{2} WHEREAS, no briefing was ordered and the case was held in abeyance pending this Court's disposition in State v. Montaño, No. S-1-SC-37021, and State v. Martinez, No. S-1-SC-37098;

{3} WHEREAS, this Court issued an opinion in State v. Montaño, 2020-NMSC-009, 468 P.3d 838, on June 11, 2020;

{4} WHEREAS, the Court finding that the issue of law presented in this case was decided by the Court's disposition in Montaño, id.; and

{5} WHEREAS, the Court exercising its discretion under Rule 12-405(B)(1) and (2) NMRA to dispose of a case by non-precedential order rather than a formal opinion;

{6} NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed and this matter is remanded to vacate Petitioner's conviction under NMSA 1978, Section 30-22-1.1 (2003).

{7} IT IS SO ORDERED.

BARBARA J. VIGIL, Justice

C. SHANNON BACON, Justice

DAVID K. THOMSON, Justice

NAKAMURA, Justice (dissenting).

{8} For the reasons set forth in my dissenting opinion in Montaño, 2020-NMSC-009, ¶¶ 69-88, I respectfully dissent.

JUDITH K. NAKAMURA, Justice


Summaries of

State v. McDowell

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Nov 12, 2020
No. S-1-SC-37199 (N.M. Nov. 12, 2020)
Case details for

State v. McDowell

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JOHN D. MCDOWELL…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

Date published: Nov 12, 2020

Citations

No. S-1-SC-37199 (N.M. Nov. 12, 2020)