From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. McClafferty

Superior Court of Delaware, New Castle County
Feb 28, 2007
No. 0601021555 (Del. Super. Ct. Feb. 28, 2007)

Opinion

No. 0601021555.

February 28, 2007.

James A. Natalie, Jr., Esquire Woloshin Lynch Natalie Gagne, P.A., Wilmington, DE.

Paul Wallace, Deputy Attorney General.


Dear Mr. Natalie:

Defendant's August 30, 2006 Motion for Modification is DENIED , without prejudice. Consistent with State v. Walls, the court will retain jurisdiction to consider a renewed motion after Defendant has served at least half of the Level V sentence imposed on June 9, 2006.

State v. Walls, Del. Supr., No. 214, 2006, Steele, C.J. (Oct.17, 2006)(ORDER).

The court is offering no assurance that it will reduce Defendant's sentence. Defendant's motion was filed within 90 days of sentencing, and this is the sort of case where the court's retaining jurisdiction is appropriate.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

State v. McClafferty

Superior Court of Delaware, New Castle County
Feb 28, 2007
No. 0601021555 (Del. Super. Ct. Feb. 28, 2007)
Case details for

State v. McClafferty

Case Details

Full title:State v. Bryan M. McClafferty

Court:Superior Court of Delaware, New Castle County

Date published: Feb 28, 2007

Citations

No. 0601021555 (Del. Super. Ct. Feb. 28, 2007)