From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. McCall

Supreme Court of North Carolina
May 1, 1928
143 S.E. 927 (N.C. 1928)

Opinion

(Filed 23 May, 1928.)

APPEAL by defendant, Lewis McCall, from Moore, J., at January Term, 1928, of BUNCOMBE, New trial.

Attorney-General Brummitt and Assistant Attorney-General Nash for the State.

W. A. Sullivan and R. R. Reynolds for defendant.


Indictment for larceny. From judgment on a verdict of guilty, defendant, Lewis McCall, appealed to the Supreme Court.


Defendant assigns as error the failure of the court in its charge to the jury to define the crime of larceny, as charged in the indictment, and also to state in a plain and correct manner the evidence given in the case, and to declare and explain the law arising thereon. C. S., 564. Upon a careful examination of the charge as contained in the case on appeal, served by defendant's counsel, and accepted by the Solicitor for the state, we must sustain this assignment of error, on the authority of S. v. Eunice, 194 N.C. 409. Defendant is entitled to a

New trial.


Summaries of

State v. McCall

Supreme Court of North Carolina
May 1, 1928
143 S.E. 927 (N.C. 1928)
Case details for

State v. McCall

Case Details

Full title:STATE v. LEWIS McCALL ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: May 1, 1928

Citations

143 S.E. 927 (N.C. 1928)
195 N.C. 877