From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Mbulu

SUPREME COURTSTATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
Mar 22, 2018
2018 N.D. 73 (N.D. 2018)

Opinion

No. 20170341

03-22-2018

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. David Mbulu, Defendant and Appellant

Nathan K. Madden, Williams County State's Attorney Office, Williston, ND, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief. Scott O. Diamond, Fargo, ND, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.


Appeal from the District Court of Williams County, Northwest Judicial District, the Honorable Joshua B. Rustad, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Nathan K. Madden, Williams County State's Attorney Office, Williston, ND, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.

Scott O. Diamond, Fargo, ND, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.

Per Curiam.

[¶1] David Mbulu appeals from criminal judgments entered after a jury found him guilty of conspiracy to commit gross sexual imposition, accomplice to gross sexual imposition, conspiracy to commit murder and attempted murder. Mbulu argues that the district court erred in granting a one-week continuance during the middle of the jury trial and that the evidence was insufficient to support the convictions. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (4).

[¶2]

Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Daniel J. Crothers

Lisa Fair McEvers

Jon J. Jensen

Jerod E. Tufte


Summaries of

State v. Mbulu

SUPREME COURTSTATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
Mar 22, 2018
2018 N.D. 73 (N.D. 2018)
Case details for

State v. Mbulu

Case Details

Full title:State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. David Mbulu, Defendant…

Court:SUPREME COURTSTATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

Date published: Mar 22, 2018

Citations

2018 N.D. 73 (N.D. 2018)
908 N.W.2d 732

Citing Cases

State v. Kolstad

[¶30] Being in the midst of trial was not alone a sufficient reason for the court to not consider a…

Mbulu v. State

His conviction was affirmed on appeal. State v. Mbulu, 2018 ND 73, 908 N.W.2d 732.…