From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Maure

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Apr 11, 1991
588 A.2d 383 (N.J. 1991)

Opinion

Argued February 13, 1991 —

Decided April 11, 1991.

On appeal from the Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Riaz A. Mian argued the cause for appellant David Maure ( Voorhees, Bennett Wherry, attorneys; Riaz A. Mian and E. John Wherry, Jr., on the brief).

Carl L. Taraschi argued the cause for appellant Harold Petty.

Stephen H. Monson, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent ( Robert J. Del Tufo, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).


The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Baime's opinion for the Appellate Division, reported at 240 N.J. Super. 269, 573 A.2d 186 (1990).

For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O'HERN, GARIBALDI and STEIN — 7.

Opposed — None.


Summaries of

State v. Maure

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Apr 11, 1991
588 A.2d 383 (N.J. 1991)
Case details for

State v. Maure

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. DAVID MAURE…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Apr 11, 1991

Citations

588 A.2d 383 (N.J. 1991)
588 A.2d 383

Citing Cases

State v. Thoresen

Petition for certification granted, and that portion of the judgment of the Appellate Division that remanded…

State v. Slinger

We disagree. In State v. Maure, 240 N.J. Super. 269, 573 A.2d 186 (App.Div. 1990), aff'd o.b., 123 N.J. 457,…