From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Matt

Oregon Court of Appeals
Sep 28, 1983
669 P.2d 840 (Or. Ct. App. 1983)

Opinion

C82-08-36733; CA A27414

Argued and submitted August 24, 1983

Reversed and remanded September 28, 1983

Appeal from Circuit Court, Multnomah County.

John J. Murchison, Judge.

J. Marvin Kuhn, Chief Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem.

Jan Peter Londahl, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and James E. Mountain, Jr., Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Warren and Rossman, Judges.


PER CURIAM.

Reversed and remanded for entry of a new judgment.


Defendant was convicted of arson in the first degree and of conspiracy to commit the same arson. He contends he may not be convicted of both. ORS 161.485(3) provides:

"A person shall not be convicted on the basis of the same course of conduct of both the actual commission of an offense and an attempt to commit that offense or solicitation of that offense or conspiracy to commit that offense."

Defendant is correct, and we reverse and remand for entry of a new judgment.

The question raised in defendant's other assignment of error was not raised in the trial court; therefore, it is not cognizable on appeal. State v. Charles, 3 Or. App. 172, 469 P.2d 792, rev den (1970), cert den 406 U.S. 973 (1972).


Summaries of

State v. Matt

Oregon Court of Appeals
Sep 28, 1983
669 P.2d 840 (Or. Ct. App. 1983)
Case details for

State v. Matt

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. ROBERT EDWIN MATT, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Sep 28, 1983

Citations

669 P.2d 840 (Or. Ct. App. 1983)
669 P.2d 840

Citing Cases

State v. McNamer

Defendant is correct; his conviction for conspiracy to deliver a controlled substance is vacated. See, e.g.,…