From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Maschari

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Sixth District, Erie County
Jun 9, 2003
Court of Appeals No. E-03-029 (Ohio Ct. App. Jun. 9, 2003)

Opinion

Court of Appeals No. E-03-029.

Decided June 9, 2003.

Michael Carpenter, pro se.


DECISION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY


{¶ 1} This matter is before us on relator Michael Carpenter's petition for a writ of procedendo ordering respondent, Judge Ann B. Maschari, to proceed to final judgment on relator's petition for postconviction relief.

{¶ 2} Pursuant to 6th Dist.Loc.App.R. 6, a relator shall "* * * file a praecipe directing the clerk of the court of appeals to serve a copy of the complaint on each other party at the addresses listed in the praecipe." The record before us reveals that relator did not file a praecipe along with his petition. Accordingly, respondent has not been properly served by the clerk with a copy of the petition.

{¶ 3} For this reason, we find the petition for a writ of procedendo not well-taken and denied. This cause is dismissed at relator's costs.

PETITION DENIED.

Richard W. Knepper, J., Mark L. Pietrykowski, J., and Arlene Singer, J.


Summaries of

State v. Maschari

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Sixth District, Erie County
Jun 9, 2003
Court of Appeals No. E-03-029 (Ohio Ct. App. Jun. 9, 2003)
Case details for

State v. Maschari

Case Details

Full title:State of Ohio, ex rel. Michael Carpenter, Relator v. Judge Ann B…

Court:Court of Appeals of Ohio, Sixth District, Erie County

Date published: Jun 9, 2003

Citations

Court of Appeals No. E-03-029 (Ohio Ct. App. Jun. 9, 2003)