From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Martinez

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
Mar 6, 2017
NO. 2017 KW 0022 (La. Ct. App. Mar. 6, 2017)

Opinion

NO. 2017 KW 0022

03-06-2017

STATE OF LOUISIANA v. BRANDON MIKEL MARTINEZ


In Re: State of Louisiana, applying for supervisory writs, 17th Judicial District Court, Parish of Lafourche, No. 544,263. BEFORE: WELCH, GRAIN, AND HOLDRIDGE, JJ.

WRIT DENIED IN PART AND GRANTED IN PART. In the instant case, the respondent's blood-alcohol test results are inadmissible as presumptive evidence of intoxication. To that extent the writ is denied, as the district court's ruling was correct. However, assuming the results are otherwise reliable, the State may use blood-alcohol test results obtained without strict compliance with the requirements in La. R.S. 32:661 as circumstantial evidence that would allow the fact-finder to draw an inference of the defendant's intoxication. See State v. Shirley, 2008-2106 (La. 5/5/09), 10 So.3d 224, 233. Accordingly, the ruling granting the respondent's motion to suppress is reversed in part, and this matter is remanded to the district court for further proceedings.

JEW

WJC

Holdridge, J., dissents in part, and would deny the writ. COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT /s/_________

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT


Summaries of

State v. Martinez

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
Mar 6, 2017
NO. 2017 KW 0022 (La. Ct. App. Mar. 6, 2017)
Case details for

State v. Martinez

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF LOUISIANA v. BRANDON MIKEL MARTINEZ

Court:STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

Date published: Mar 6, 2017

Citations

NO. 2017 KW 0022 (La. Ct. App. Mar. 6, 2017)