From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Martinex

Utah Court of Appeals
Mar 7, 2002
2002 UT App. 71 (Utah Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

Case No. 20010581-CA.

Filed March 7, 2002. (Not For Official Publication)

Appeal from the Second District, Ogden Department, The Honorable Roger S. Dutson.

Maurice Richards and Jerald Engstrom, Ogden, for Appellant.

Mark Shurtleff and Brett J. DelPorto, Salt Lake City, for Appellee.

Before Judges Billings, Orme, and Thorne.


MEMORANDUM DECISION


Appellant appeals his Conviction, Judgment and Sentence for two counts of Aggravated Sexual Assault, in violation of Utah Code Ann. § 76-5-405(Supp. 1999), and one count of sodomy on a child, in violation of Utah Code Ann. § 76-5-403.1(Supp. 1999). Appellant's appointed counsel filed an Anders-type brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967) (adopted in Utah by) State v. Clayton, 639 P.2d 168 (Utah 1981). The brief satisfies the requirements of this court's opinion in that case. Counsel further certified that he had provided Appellant a copy of the proposed Anders-type brief and has incorporated into the brief all issues raised by Appellant. See State v. Wells, 2000 UT App 304,¶¶ 8-10, 13 P.3d 1056. Based on our examination of the record and all proceedings in the trial court, we determine the appeal is wholly frivolous.

Accordingly, we affirm the trial court's conviction and sentence and grant counsel's motion to withdraw.

Gregory K. Orme, Judge, William A. Thorne, Jr., Judge.


Summaries of

State v. Martinex

Utah Court of Appeals
Mar 7, 2002
2002 UT App. 71 (Utah Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

State v. Martinex

Case Details

Full title:State of Utah, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Arthur Ray Martinez, Defendant…

Court:Utah Court of Appeals

Date published: Mar 7, 2002

Citations

2002 UT App. 71 (Utah Ct. App. 2002)

Citing Cases

Johnson v. State

DB The testimony of appellant's flight and resistance to arrest was admissible as showing consciousness of…