From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Martin

ALABAMA COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
Nov 16, 2018
287 So. 3d 399 (Ala. Crim. App. 2018)

Opinion

CR-15-0664

11-16-2018

STATE of Alabama v. George MARTIN

Luther Strange and Steve Marshall, attys. gen., and Audrey K. Jordan, asst. atty. gen., for appellant. Bryan A. Stevenson and Aaryn M. Urell, Montgomery; and John H. Sharer, Andrew R. Keats, and Zathrina G. Perez, Los Angeles, California, for appellee.


Luther Strange and Steve Marshall, attys. gen., and Audrey K. Jordan, asst. atty. gen., for appellant.

Bryan A. Stevenson and Aaryn M. Urell, Montgomery; and John H. Sharer, Andrew R. Keats, and Zathrina G. Perez, Los Angeles, California, for appellee.

On Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court

JOINER, Judge.

The State of Alabama appealed the circuit court's dismissal with prejudice of the capital-murder indictment returned against George Martin. This Court affirmed the dismissal. State v. Martin, 287 So. 3d 355 (Ala. Crim. App. 2017). The State then petitioned the Alabama Supreme Court for certiorari review. On August 31, 2018, the Alabama Supreme Court reversed this Court's judgment, directing this Court "to remand [the case] for a new trial." State v. Martin, 287 So.3d 384, 399 (Ala. 2018).

In accordance with the direction of the Alabama Supreme Court, we reverse the judgment of the circuit court, and we remand the case to that court for a new trial. State v. Martin, supra.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Windom, P.J., and Welch and Kellum, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Martin

ALABAMA COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
Nov 16, 2018
287 So. 3d 399 (Ala. Crim. App. 2018)
Case details for

State v. Martin

Case Details

Full title:State of Alabama v. George Martin

Court:ALABAMA COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

Date published: Nov 16, 2018

Citations

287 So. 3d 399 (Ala. Crim. App. 2018)