Opinion
A22-1349
12-27-2023
ORDER ON PETITION FOR FURTHER REVIEW
Issue Granted:
Did Martens defense counsel forfeit his argument about application of the reporting statute? Did the court of appeals correctly interpret the statute?
Granted
A22-1349
12-27-2023
ORDER ON PETITION FOR FURTHER REVIEW
Issue Granted:
Did Martens defense counsel forfeit his argument about application of the reporting statute? Did the court of appeals correctly interpret the statute?
Granted
Full title:State of Minnesota v. Ryan James Martens
Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota
Date published: Dec 27, 2023