Summary
In State v. Troupe, supra, 284, however, we restricted the doctrine so that a constancy of accusation witness could testify only to the fact and the timing of the victim's complaint.
Summary of this case from State v. MarshallOpinion
Decided June 25, 1997
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 45 Conn. App. 66 (AC 14408), is granted, limited to the following issue:
"Whether the Appellate Court properly held that the trial court's admission of the two videotapes of the accusing child witness and the testimony of the six other witnesses as constancy of accusation evidence was proper?"
The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15717.
Pamela S. Nagy, special assistant public defender, in support of the petition.
Robert J. Scheinblum, deputy assistant state's attorney, in opposition.