From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Marrero

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
May 31, 2022
343 Conn. 468 (Conn. 2022)

Opinion

SC 20525

05-31-2022

STATE of Connecticut v. Nector MARRERO

Julia K. Conlin, assigned counsel, with whom was Emily Graner Sexton, assigned counsel, for the appellant (defendant). Sarah Hanna, senior assistant state's attorney, with whom, on the brief, were Paul J. Ferencek, state's attorney, and Joseph C. Valdes, supervisory assistant state's attorney, for the appellee (state).


Julia K. Conlin, assigned counsel, with whom was Emily Graner Sexton, assigned counsel, for the appellant (defendant).

Sarah Hanna, senior assistant state's attorney, with whom, on the brief, were Paul J. Ferencek, state's attorney, and Joseph C. Valdes, supervisory assistant state's attorney, for the appellee (state).

McDonald, D'Auria, Mullins, Kahn, Ecker and Keller, Js.

PER CURIAM. The defendant, Nector Marrero, appeals, upon our grant of his petition for certification, from the judgment of the Appellate Court affirming his conviction of home invasion in violation of General Statutes § 53a-100aa (a) (1), burglary in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-101 (a) (3), and assault in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-60 (a) (1). State v. Marrero , 198 Conn. App. 90, 94, 136, 234 A.3d 1 (2020). On appeal, the defendant contends that the Appellate Court incorrectly concluded that the prosecutor had not engaged in prosecutorial impropriety by using leading questions during his direct examination of a hostile witness.

We granted the defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the judgment of the Appellate Court, limited to the following issue: "Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the prosecutor's asking leading questions of a hostile witness during direct examination did not constitute prosecutorial impropriety?" State v. Marrero , 335 Conn. 961, 239 A.3d 1214 (2020).

After examining the entire record on appeal and considering the briefs and oral arguments of the parties, we have determined that the appeal in this case should be dismissed on the ground that certification was improvidently granted.

The appeal is dismissed.


Summaries of

State v. Marrero

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
May 31, 2022
343 Conn. 468 (Conn. 2022)
Case details for

State v. Marrero

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Connecticut v. Nector MARRERO

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: May 31, 2022

Citations

343 Conn. 468 (Conn. 2022)
274 A.3d 865