From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Manuel T.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jan 31, 2019
330 Conn. 968 (Conn. 2019)

Opinion

01-31-2019

STATE of Connecticut v. MANUEL T.

Trent A. LaLima, in support of the petition. Ronald G. Weller, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.


The defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 186 Conn.App. 51, 198 A.3d 648 (2018), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court apply the proper standard in determining that, in a criminal prosecution for sexual abuse of a child, hearsay statements made during a forensic interview of the child complainant are admissible under § 8-3 (5) of the Connecticut Code of Evidence?

"2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by excluding from evidence certain screenshots of text messages?"


Summaries of

State v. Manuel T.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jan 31, 2019
330 Conn. 968 (Conn. 2019)
Case details for

State v. Manuel T.

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Connecticut v. MANUEL T.

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Jan 31, 2019

Citations

330 Conn. 968 (Conn. 2019)
200 A.3d 189

Citing Cases

State v. Freddy T.

In Manuel T. , this court defined the test for determining the admissibility of hearsay statements under §…

State v. Porfil

See, e.g., State v. Garcia , 299 Conn. 39, 57, 7 A.3d 355 (2010) ("Both courts and commentators have noted…