From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Manuel

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
Aug 5, 2016
198 So. 3d 959 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

No. 2D15–3573.

08-05-2016

STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Ian MANUEL, Appellee.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Johnny T. Salgado, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellant. Peter M. Dennis, Fort Myers, and Bryan A. Stevenson of Equal Justice Initiative, Montgomery, Alabama, for Appellee.


Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Johnny T. Salgado, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellant.

Peter M. Dennis, Fort Myers, and Bryan A. Stevenson of Equal Justice Initiative, Montgomery, Alabama, for Appellee.

SILBERMAN, Judge.

The State appeals the order granting Ian Manuel's motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Manuel challenged his sentence of sixty-five years in prison to be followed by two years of community control and eight years of probation for a robbery with a firearm that he committed in 1990 when he was thirteen years old. The order provides that Manuel is entitled to resentencing pursuant to Peters v. State, 128 So.3d 832, 851–55 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013).

Manuel is also serving a forty-year sentence for the life felony of attempted murder with a firearm that arose from the same incident as the robbery with a firearm. In Peters, the Fourth District determined that Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48, 130 S.Ct. 2011, 176 L.Ed.2d 825 (2010), created a statutory anomaly in which the maximum penalty for an aggravated first-degree felony is more harsh than the sentence a juvenile who commits a life felony faces; therefore, the Eighth Amendment requires that a juvenile's sentence for an aggravated first-degree felony committed during the time the statutory anomaly existed, between October 1, 1983, and July 1, 1995, not exceed forty years in prison. See 128 So.3d at 854–55. We agree with Peters to the extent that it requires Manuel to be resentenced to no more than forty years in prison on the 1990 offense of robbery with a firearm in count one due to the statutory anomaly. Thus, we affirm the trial court's order.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

State v. Manuel

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
Aug 5, 2016
198 So. 3d 959 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
Case details for

State v. Manuel

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellant, v. IAN MANUEL, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

Date published: Aug 5, 2016

Citations

198 So. 3d 959 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)