From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Manning

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Oct 9, 2024
No. 2024-UP-341 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 9, 2024)

Opinion

2024-UP-341 Appellate Case 2022-000451

10-09-2024

The State, Respondent, v. Joshua Darek Manning, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Melody Jane Brown, both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted September 1, 2024

Appeal From Dillon County Michael S. Holt, Circuit Court Judge

Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Melody Jane Brown, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:

Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

THOMAS, HEWITT, and VINSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Manning

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Oct 9, 2024
No. 2024-UP-341 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 9, 2024)
Case details for

State v. Manning

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Joshua Darek Manning, Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Oct 9, 2024

Citations

No. 2024-UP-341 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 9, 2024)