From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Malay

Court of Errors and Appeals
Sep 10, 1925
130 A. 920 (N.J. 1925)

Opinion

Submitted May 29, 1925 —

Decided September 10, 1925.

On error to the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 3 N.J. Mis. R. 235.

For the plaintiff in error, Elmer W. Romine.

For the defendant in error, James H. Bolitho, prosecutor of the pleas.


The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — TRENCHARD, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

State v. Malay

Court of Errors and Appeals
Sep 10, 1925
130 A. 920 (N.J. 1925)
Case details for

State v. Malay

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. WILLIAM MALAY, PLAINTIFF IN…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Sep 10, 1925

Citations

130 A. 920 (N.J. 1925)
130 A. 920