From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Maiolo

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Second District, Clark County
Nov 26, 2003
2003 Ohio 6542 (Ohio Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

Case No. 2002-CA-86.

Rendered on November 26, 2003.

Criminal Appeal from Common Pleas Court, T.C. Case No. 99-CR-61.

David E. Smith, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, Clark County Prosecutor's Office, P.O. Box 1608, Springfield, Ohio 45501, Attorney for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Charles W. Slicer, III, Atty. Reg. #0059927, 111 W. First Street, Suite 401, Dayton, Ohio 45402, Attorney for Defendant-Appellant.


OPINION


{¶ 1} Appellant entered into negotiated pleas to robbery and forgery for a two year sentence and a nine month sentence to be served concurrently. He was also sentenced to a 2 year prison term for the forgery resulting from his conviction after a jury trial in 02-CR-68 which was the subject of the appeal in this court's case number 2002-CA-87. Appellant requests in a single assignment that he be resentenced in the event we should reverse his forgery conviction in 02-CR-68. Since we affirmed his conviction in 02-CR-68, appellant is entitled to no relief and his assignment of error is overruled.

Judgment Affirmed.

Brogan, J., Wolff, J., and Young, J., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Maiolo

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Second District, Clark County
Nov 26, 2003
2003 Ohio 6542 (Ohio Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

State v. Maiolo

Case Details

Full title:State of Ohio, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James T. Maiolo, Defendant-Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of Ohio, Second District, Clark County

Date published: Nov 26, 2003

Citations

2003 Ohio 6542 (Ohio Ct. App. 2003)