From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Main

Court of Appeals of Iowa.
Jan 9, 2014
843 N.W.2d 477 (Iowa Ct. App. 2014)

Opinion

No. 12–2265.

2014-01-9

STATE of Iowa, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Anthony MAIN, Defendant–Appellant.


In evaluating evidence sufficient to prove an element of a crime, our supreme court has said the evidence must “raise a fair inference of guilt and do more than create speculation, suspicion, or conjecture.” State v. Hamilton, 309 N.W.2d 471, 479 (Iowa 1981). The evidence surrounding this assault creates a suspicion of intent to commit sexual abuse, but it does not raise a fair inference of specific intent. I would reverse and remand for entry of judgment on the lesser-included offense of assault. See State v. Pace, 602 N.W.2d 764, 774 (Iowa 1999).


Summaries of

State v. Main

Court of Appeals of Iowa.
Jan 9, 2014
843 N.W.2d 477 (Iowa Ct. App. 2014)
Case details for

State v. Main

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Iowa, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Anthony MAIN, Defendant–Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of Iowa.

Date published: Jan 9, 2014

Citations

843 N.W.2d 477 (Iowa Ct. App. 2014)