State v. Mahon

Full title: The State, Respondent, v. Holly Earlene Ashby Mahon, Appellant.

Court: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Mar 14, 2018

Appellate Case No. 2016-002521 (S.C. Ct. App. Mar. 14, 2018)

Opinion

2018-UP-108

03-14-2018

The State, Respondent, v. Holly Earlene Ashby Mahon, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of Columbia, and Holly Earlene Ashby Mahon, pro se, for Appellant. Matthew C. Buchanan, of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted February 1, 2018

Appeal From Dorchester County Maite Murphy, No. 2016-002521 Circuit Court Judge

Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of Columbia, and Holly Earlene Ashby Mahon, pro se, for Appellant.

Matthew C. Buchanan, of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:

Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.^[1]

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, GEATHERS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.