From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Madden

Oregon Court of Appeals
Sep 28, 1972
501 P.2d 71 (Or. Ct. App. 1972)

Opinion

No. 71-1055-C

Argued September 18, 1972

Affirmed September 28, 1972

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jackson County.

L. L. Sawyer, Judge.

William G. Purdy, Medford, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Frohnmayer Deatherage, Medford.

Thomas H. Denney, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Lee Johnson, Attorney General, and John W. Osburn, Solicitor General, Salem.

Before SCHWAB, Chief Judge, and LANGTRY and FORT, Judges.


AFFIRMED.


Upon trial by jury in the district court, defendant was convicted of driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor and sentenced to 60 days in jail. He appealed to the circuit court pursuant to ORS 157.080, and upon trial de novo was found guilty and sentenced to 90 days in jail. On appeal to this court he argues that it was constitutional error for the circuit court to impose a sentence greater than that imposed by the district court.

We find to the contrary. State v. Turner, 247 Or. 301, 316, n 3, 429 P.2d 565 (1967); Colten v. Kentucky, 407 U.S. 104, 92 S Ct 1953, 32 L Ed 2d 584 (1972).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Madden

Oregon Court of Appeals
Sep 28, 1972
501 P.2d 71 (Or. Ct. App. 1972)
Case details for

State v. Madden

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. LESTER EDWARD MADDEN, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Sep 28, 1972

Citations

501 P.2d 71 (Or. Ct. App. 1972)
501 P.2d 71

Citing Cases

State v. Ehrhard

In the fourth assignment, defendant urges that the imposition of a greater sentence in circuit court than he…

State v. Buen

In Colten v. Kentucky, 407 U.S. 104, 92 S Ct 1953, 32 L Ed 2d 584 (1972), the United States Supreme Court…