From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Mack

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Dec 10, 2014
Appellate Case No. 2013-000664 (S.C. Ct. App. Dec. 10, 2014)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2013-000664 Unpublished Opinion No. 2014-UP-450

12-10-2014

The State, Respondent, v. Dewayne Mack, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Appeal From Florence County
D. Craig Brown, Circuit Court Judge

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, both of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California., 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

WILLIAMS, GEATHERS, and McDONALD, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Mack

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Dec 10, 2014
Appellate Case No. 2013-000664 (S.C. Ct. App. Dec. 10, 2014)
Case details for

State v. Mack

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Dewayne Mack, Appellant.

Court:STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Dec 10, 2014

Citations

Appellate Case No. 2013-000664 (S.C. Ct. App. Dec. 10, 2014)