From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Lynch

Superior Court of Maine
Dec 12, 2011
UNIFIED CRIMINAL DOCKET Docket No. CR-11-5886 (Me. Super. Dec. 12, 2011)

Opinion

UNIFIED CRIMINAL DOCKET Docket No. CR-11-5886

12-12-2011

STATE OF MAINE v. ERIC LYNCH Defendant


STATE OF MAINE
CUMBERLAND, ss.
ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTS TWO AND FOUR

The Defendant Eric Lynch seeks to dismiss two of the domestic violence charges against him on the ground that the alleged victim of Counts 2 and 4, Christina Victor, the adult child of alleged victim Denise Lynch, does not fall within the scope of "family or household member" as defined by 19-A M.R.S.A. § 4002(4).

Defendant is charged with Domestic Violence Assault, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 207-A(1)(A) against his wife, Denise (Count 1), and against Denise's daughter, Christina (Count 2), as well as with Domestic Violence Criminal Threatening, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 209-A(1)(A) against both Denise (Count 3) and Christina (Count 4). Sections 207-A and 209-A expressly reference the definition of "family or household member" set forth in 19-A M.R.S.A. § 4002(4). See 17-A M.R.S.A. § 207-A(1)(A) & 209-A(1)(A) ("A person is guilty of domestic violence assault [criminal threatening] if "[t]he person violates section 207 [209] and the victim is a family or household member as defined in Title 19-A section 4002, subsection 4. Violation of this paragraph is a Class D crime").

According to the definition set forth, for purposes of the charged offenses, "family or household members" include:

The categories listed above as the last four, ie., individuals presently or formerly living together and current or former sexual partners, are considered within the definition of "family or household members" only with respect to the protection from abuse chapter, the domestic violence statutes (17-A M.R.S.A. §§ 207-A, 209-A, 210-B, 210-C, 211-A), and for purposes of 17-A M.R.S.A. §§ 15, 1201, 1202 & 1253. See 19-A M.R.S.A. § 4002(4).

¦ spouses or domestic partners;
¦ former spouses or former domestic partners;
¦ individuals presently living together as spouses;
¦ individuals formerly living together as spouses;
¦ natural parents of the same child;
¦ adult household members related by consanguinity or affinity;
¦ minor children of a household member when the defendant is an adult household member;
¦ individuals presently living together;
¦ individuals formerly living together;
¦ individuals who are sexual partners;
¦ individuals who were formerly sexual partners.
19-A M.R.S.A. § 4002(4) (emphasis added).

The court held a brief hearing on this issue on December 6, 2011. At the hearing, Defendant conceded that during some of the time that he lived with Denise, her daughter Christina lived there too. The court heard undisputed testimony that Defendant lived with Denise and Christina for "at least three years." Accordingly, because Defendant and Christina were formerly part of the same household, they fall within the plain language of § 4002's "individuals formerly living together" -- a category expressly included within the definition of "family or household members" for purposes of the domestic violence offenses charged.

Accordingly, because the Defendant and his stepdaughter Christina Victor constitute "family or household members" as charged in the offenses set forth in Counts 2 and 4, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. DATED: 12/12/11

/s/_________

E. Mary Kelly

Judge, Unified Criminal Docket


Summaries of

State v. Lynch

Superior Court of Maine
Dec 12, 2011
UNIFIED CRIMINAL DOCKET Docket No. CR-11-5886 (Me. Super. Dec. 12, 2011)
Case details for

State v. Lynch

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF MAINE v. ERIC LYNCH Defendant

Court:Superior Court of Maine

Date published: Dec 12, 2011

Citations

UNIFIED CRIMINAL DOCKET Docket No. CR-11-5886 (Me. Super. Dec. 12, 2011)