Opinion
No. 51903-4-I.
Filed: April 12, 2004. UNPUBLISHED OPINION
Appeal from Superior Court of King County. Docket No: 02-1-03347-1. Judgment or order under review. Date filed: 02/24/2003. Judge signing: Hon. L Gene Middaugh.
Counsel for Appellant(s), Nielsen Broman Koch Pllc, Attorney at Law, 1908 E Madison St, Seattle, WA 98122.
Dana M Nelson, Nielsen Broman Koch PLLC, 1908 E Madison St, Seattle, WA 98122-2842.
Counsel for Respondent(s), E Bradford Bales, King Co Pros Aty Ofc, 516 3rd Ave, Seattle, WA 98104-2390.
Prosecuting Atty King County, King County Prosecutor/appellate Unit, 1850 Key Tower, 700 Fifth Avenue, Seattle, WA 98104.
Timothy Lynch appeals his convictions for possession of stolen property, possession of methamphetamine, and attempting to elude a pursuing police vehicle. He does not challenge the possession convictions, but contends the information on the eluding charge was defective for failing to allege that he did not immediately bring his vehicle to a stop. This court recently rejected the same argument in State v. Tandecki, Wn. App., 84 P.3d 1262 (2004), holding that the term `immediately' is not an element of attempting to elude a police vehicle. Tandecki controls this case. Lynch's convictions are affirmed.
COX and AGID, JJ., concur.