From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Lundberg

Supreme Court of Montana.
Sep 17, 2013
317 P.3d 205 (Mont. 2013)

Opinion

No. DA 12–0589.

2013-09-17

STATE of Montana, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Crystal Lee LUNDBERG, Defendant and Appellant.


¶ 15 We have determined to decide this case pursuant to Section I, Paragraph 3(d) of our Internal Operating Rules, which provides for noncitable memorandum opinions. Issue 1 presents a legal issue that is controlled by settled Montana law which the District Court correctly interpreted. Issue 2 was not preserved for appellate review. Issue 3 presents a legal issue which the District Court incorrectly interpreted. We therefore remand this issue to the District Court for a determination on the record of Lundberg's ability to pay counsel fees.

We Concur: MICHAEL E. WHEAT, BETH BAKER, BRIAN MORRIS and JIM RICE.


Summaries of

State v. Lundberg

Supreme Court of Montana.
Sep 17, 2013
317 P.3d 205 (Mont. 2013)
Case details for

State v. Lundberg

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Montana, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Crystal Lee LUNDBERG…

Court:Supreme Court of Montana.

Date published: Sep 17, 2013

Citations

317 P.3d 205 (Mont. 2013)
372 Mont. 551