With respect to Golding ’s first two prongs, we conclude that the record, which contains the full transcript of the trial proceedings, is adequate for our review and that the claim is of constitutional magnitude because it implicates the defendant's sixth and fourteenth amendment rights to confront and cross-examine his accusers, and to present a defense. See, e.g., State v. Luna , 208 Conn. App. 45, 67–68, 262 A.3d 942, cert. denied, 340 Conn. 917, 266 A.3d 146 (2021). Accordingly, the defendant's constitutional claim is reviewable, and we address it under the third prong of Golding , namely, whether the alleged constitutional violation exists and whether it deprived the defendant of a fair trial.

.Luna, 208 Conn.App. 45, 52, 262 A.3d 942, cert. denied, 340 Conn. 917, 266 A.3d 146 (2021).

(Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Luna , 208 Conn. App. 45, 68–69, 262 A.3d 942, cert. denied, 340 Conn. 917, 266 A.3d 146 (2021) ; see also State v. Castro , 200 Conn. App. 450, 457–58, 238 A.3d 813, cert. denied, 335 Conn. 983, 242 A.3d 105 (2020). We note also that "waiver of a fundamental right may not be presumed from a silent record."