An information was filed charging appellant with the offense of escape from Union Correctional Institution. On motion of the defendant, the trial court dismissed the information based upon deprivations of appellant's rights to speedy trial, right to counsel, due process and equal protection. The state appealed this dismissal order to this court, which was docketed as Case No. LL-44. Thereafter, upon motion of the state, this court granted a stay of appellate proceedings until identical issues upon which the trial court based its dismissal order were decided in the case of State v. Luke, 382 So.2d 1265 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980). This court's decision in State v. Luke held that the placement of prisoners in administrative confinement pending ultimate disposition of the charges, coupled with prosecutorial delay, did not violate due process and equal protection rights of prisoners, and that dismissal of pending criminal charges against Luke and others was error.
PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See, State v. Luke, 382 So.2d 1265 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980). McCORD, BOOTH and SHIVERS, JJ., concur.
AFFIRMED. See State v. Luke, 382 So.2d 1265 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980). McCORD, BOOTH, and SHIVERS, JJ., concur.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Brown v. State, 355 So.2d 138 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Eans v. State, 366 So.2d 540 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); State v. Newman, 367 So.2d 251 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979); State v. Brown, 376 So.2d 382 (Fla. 1979); Sliger v. State, 382 So.2d 373 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); State v. Luke, 382 So.2d 1265 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980).