From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Lucio

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Jun 19, 1978
359 So. 2d 984 (La. 1978)

Opinion

No. 61352.

June 19, 1978.

Appeal from 24th Judicial District Court, Parish of Jefferson; Wallace C. LeBrun, Judge.

A. J. Boudreaux, Staff Appeals Counsel, Indigent Defender Bd., New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., John M. Mamoulides, Dist. Atty., James D. Maxwell, Asst. Dist. Atty., Abbott J. Reeves, Director, Research and Appeals Div., Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.


Defendant was charged by bill of information with the crime of aggravated battery, La.R.S. 14:34. The defendant was found guilty as charged and sentenced to serve ten years at hard labor. On appeal he relies on two assignments of error for reversal of his conviction and sentence.

We have examined the entire record and find that the errors complained of probably did not result in a miscarriage of justice, were not prejudicial to the substantial rights of accused, and did not constitute a substantial violation of a constitutional or statutory right. Accordingly, we affirm the defendant's conviction and sentence.

CALOGERO, J., concurs and assigns reasons.


By assignment of error number 1 defendant properly complains of inadmissible hearsay. What an officer had related to him by witnesses about the event shortly after the stabbing was not part of the res gestae, as the state contends. Nonetheless, I concur in the affirmance of this conviction believing that there was insufficient prejudice to warrant a reversal.


Summaries of

State v. Lucio

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Jun 19, 1978
359 So. 2d 984 (La. 1978)
Case details for

State v. Lucio

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF LOUISIANA v. LOUIS F. LUCIO

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Jun 19, 1978

Citations

359 So. 2d 984 (La. 1978)