Summary
In Lovesee v. State, 137 Wis. 94, 118 N.W. 553, it was held that the fact that a judgment was not entered in a criminal case was not sufficient ground for refusing to consider a writ of error, but the scope of the writ of error was not deemed broad enough to encompass a motion for a new trial under sec. 358.11, Stats., and the writ in that case was dismissed.
Summary of this case from Martin v. StateOpinion
NO. A149068
2013-02-21
State v. Michael Joseph Lovesee
AFFIRMED WITHOUT OPINION.