From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Love

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Jan 14, 1952
220 La. 562 (La. 1952)

Opinion

No. 40517.

January 14, 1952.

APPEAL FROM NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF RAPIDES, STATE OF LOUISIANA, HONORABLE ALLEN V. HUNDLEY, J.

A. M. D'Angelo, Alexandria, for defendant-appellant.

Bolivar E. Kemp, Jr., Atty. Gen., M. E. Culligan, Ass't Atty. Gen., Ben F. Thompson, Jr., Dist. Atty., George M. Foote, Ass't Dist. Atty., Alexandria, for appellee.


Appellant was convicted of criminal neglect of family in violation of LSA-R.S. 14:74, as amended by Act No. 164 of 1950, in that he failed to provide support for two minor children, born out of wedlock to one Gladys Thompson, and was sentenced to serve one year in the parish jail. His appeal presents several issues of law which were raised by motions to quash, in arrest of judgment and for a new trial.

We find it unnecessary to consider the various matters urged by counsel as the admitted facts of the case are that the two minor children are illegitimate, having been born to the complainant, Gladys Thompson, approximately five and seven years after the death of her husband and there is no evidence to show that appellant either acknowledged them in accordance with Article 203, Civil Code, or that a judgment has ever been rendered by a court of competent jurisdiction declaring him to be their father. Hence, his conviction cannot stand in view of our rulings in State v. Jones, 220 La. 381, 56 So.2d 724, and State v. Sims, 220 La. 532, 57 So.2d 177.

The conviction and sentence are therefore annulled and appellant is ordered discharged.

HAMITER, J., dissents.

HAWTHORNE, J., dissents; for dissenting opinion see 220 La. 555, 57 So. 177.


Summaries of

State v. Love

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Jan 14, 1952
220 La. 562 (La. 1952)
Case details for

State v. Love

Case Details

Full title:STATE v. LOVE

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Jan 14, 1952

Citations

220 La. 562 (La. 1952)
57 So. 2d 187

Citing Cases

State v. Mack

[25] HAWTHORNE, Justice (dissenting). I should like to state once again that I do not agree with the holding…

State v. Hubbard

The majority of this court rendered the 1950 and 1952 acts ineffective insofar as unacknowledged illegitimate…