From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Long

Oregon Court of Appeals
May 22, 1991
107 Or. App. 284 (Or. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

DA 363899; CA A61733

Motion for reconsideration filed April 15, 1991

Reconsideration allowed and opinion adhered to as clarified May 22, 1991

Appeal from District Court, Multnomah County.

Charles B. Guinasso, Judge.

Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Robert M. Atkinson, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, for the motion.

Before Joseph, Chief Judge, and Warren and Rossman, Judges. ROSSMAN, J.

Motion for reconsideration allowed; opinion adhered to as clarified.


The state moves for reconsideration of our opinion, 106 Or. App. 389, 807 P.2d 815 (1991), seeking clarification of a portion. We allow the motion.

The opinion states, in part:

"The statute permits carrying loaded firearms, if they are licensed and unconcealed. The ordinance prohibits carrying loaded firearms, even if they are licensed." 106 Or App at 394.

We clarify that statement by pointing out that both the statute and the ordinance permit a person licensed to do so to carry a loaded and concealed firearm. Accordingly, the passage quoted above is deleted, and this language is substituted:

"The statute permits carrying loaded firearms, if they are licensed and unconcealed. It permits the carrying of loaded and concealed firearms if the person is licensed to do so. The ordinance prohibits carrying loaded firearms, even if they are unconcealed, except that, like the statute, it permits the carrying of loaded and concealed firearms by persons licensed to do so."

Motion for reconsideration allowed; opinion adhered to as clarified.


Summaries of

State v. Long

Oregon Court of Appeals
May 22, 1991
107 Or. App. 284 (Or. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

State v. Long

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, and the City of Portland, Respondents, v. PAUL JAY LONG…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: May 22, 1991

Citations

107 Or. App. 284 (Or. Ct. App. 1991)
812 P.2d 831

Citing Cases

State v. Zelinka

Defendant argues that the instruction was an improper comment on the evidence and created a presumption that…

State v. Roman

However, Milnes does not foreclose other ways falsity can be established.The portion of Milnes upon which…