From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Lombardi

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jun 7, 2000
168 Or. App. 378 (Or. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

Nos. 960836110; CA A98097

Argued and submitted April 25, 2000.

Filed: June 7, 2000

Appeal from Circuit Court, Multnomah County, Anna J. Brown, Judge.

Mary M. Reese, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. With her on the brief was David E. Groom, Public Defender.

Holly A. Vance, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General.

Before HASELTON, PRESIDING JUDGE, and DEITS, CHIEF JUDGE, and WOLLHEIM, JUDGE.


PER CURIAM

Affirmed.


Defendant appeals his convictions for multiple sexual offenses. We write only to address his argument that the trial court erred in withholding from disclosure various records after in camera inspection. Assuming, without deciding, that defendant provided an adequate basis for our review, see State v. Weaver, 139 Or. App. 207, 911 P.2d 969, rev den 323 Or. 483 (1996), we have reviewed those materials in camera and conclude that the trial court did not err in that regard.

We reject defendant's remaining arguments without discussion.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Lombardi

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jun 7, 2000
168 Or. App. 378 (Or. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

State v. Lombardi

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. MARK CLIFFORD LOMBARDI, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Jun 7, 2000

Citations

168 Or. App. 378 (Or. Ct. App. 2000)
7 P.3d 537

Citing Cases

State v. Hernandez-Sanchez

We review de novo . State v. Leslie , 119 Or. App. 249, 251, 850 P.2d 1134, rev. den. , 317 Or. 584, 859 P.2d…