State v. Lofton

1 Citing case

  1. State v. Haven

    No. M2001-00332-CCA-R3-CD (Tenn. Crim. App. Jul. 18, 2002)   Cited 2 times
    Stating that enhancement factor may apply to a DUI sentence when proof exists that other people were in the area or were placed at risk by the defendant's conduct

    However, recently decided cases clearly support the trial judge's determination. See State v. Cynthia C. Warren, No. W2000-002261-CCA-R3-CD, 2002 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 240, at *8 (Tenn.Crim.App. at Jackson, Mar. 14, 2002); State v. Willie G. Lofton, No. W2001-00780-CCA-R3-CD, 2002 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 128, at *6-*11 (Tenn.Crim.App. at Jackson, Feb. 14, 2002); State v. Gregory Flittner, M2000-02367-CCA-R3-CD, 2001 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 948, at *18-*20 (Tenn.Crim.App. at Nashville, Dec. 14, 2001); State v. Donald Lee Reid, No. M2000-02026-CCA-R3-CD, 2001 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 699, at *10-*14 (Tenn.Crim.App. at Nashville, Sept. 7, 2001); Humphreys, 70 S.W.3d at 763-64; see also State v. Burns, 6 S.W.3d 453, 466-67 (Tenn. 1999).