Opinion
20220019 20220020 20220021
09-29-2022
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Christopher Lockwood, Defendant and Appellant
Joshua A. Amundson, Assistant State's Attorney, Bismarck, ND, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief. Christopher W. Lockwood, Bismarck, ND, self-represented, defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.
Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Daniel J. Borgen, Judge.
Joshua A. Amundson, Assistant State's Attorney, Bismarck, ND, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.
Christopher W. Lockwood, Bismarck, ND, self-represented, defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Christopher Lockwood appeals from three amended criminal judgments revoking his probation and resentencing him. It is unclear what Lockwood argues on appeal because his brief does not contain the minimum requirements in N.D.R.App.P. 28. Under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(8), this Court may summarily affirm a judgment if the appellant's brief fails to comply with N.D.R.App.P. 28. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(8).
[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Gerald W.VandeWalle, Daniel J. Crothers, Lisa Fair McEvers, Jerod E. Tufte.