From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Lloyd

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jan 21, 1992
818 P.2d 982 (Or. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

10-85-01398; CA A64781

Argued and submitted December 17, 1990.

Affirmed October 9, 1991. Reconsideration denied November 27, 1991. Petition for review allowed January 21, 1992 ( 312 Or. 588) See later issue Oregon Reports

Appeal from Circuit Court, Lane County, Douglas R. Spencer, Senior Judge.

Jay Edwards, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Robert M. Atkinson, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Rossman and De Muniz, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Affirmed.


Defendant appealed his conviction for first degree sodomy, ORS 163.405, and we affirmed. State v. Lloyd, 87 Or. App. 212, 741 P.2d 936 (1987), rev den 305 Or. 672 (1988). He then filed a petition for post-conviction relief, alleging that he had been denied effective assistance of trial and appellate counsel. He claimed that trial counsel failed to object properly to the testimony of a purported expert witness and that appellate counsel had failed to assign as error the trial court's admitting that testimony. The post-conviction court found that the evidence was not admissible and was prejudicial and that defendant had been denied the effective assistance of trial and appellate counsel. As a remedy, it ordered that he be afforded a "delayed appeal on the evidentiary issues."

Neither party appealed from that judgment. Instead, defendant filed this delayed direct appeal from his conviction. Because defendant had already had a direct appeal, the only appropriate remedy in the post-conviction proceeding, given the trial court's findings and conclusions, was to grant him a new trial. If that had been done, the evidentiary questions on which the post-conviction court ruled could have been reviewed on the state's appeal from that judgment. The only record on this direct appeal is the same as the record on defendant's first appeal, and defendant may not raise new issues now that could have been raised then.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Lloyd

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jan 21, 1992
818 P.2d 982 (Or. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

State v. Lloyd

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. DAVID F. LLOYD, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Jan 21, 1992

Citations

818 P.2d 982 (Or. Ct. App. 1992)
818 P.2d 982

Citing Cases

Wight v. Brown

Allegations of ineffective assistance of trial or appellate counsel are properly raised in post-conviction.…

State v. Macy

111 Or App at 85-86. Relying on State v. Lloyd, 109 Or. App. 213, 818 P.2d 982 (1991), rev dismissed 315 Or.…